The Basic Eight by Daniel Handler
“Dear Diary, my
teen-angst bullshit now has a body count.” – Heathers, 1988
The cover alone makes
allusions to the 1988 film of croquet-playing, murderous high-school teenagers,
yet Handler’s delightfully unreliable narrator Flannery Culp and the sharp,
black humour creates a novel that is entirely fresh – with its tongue firmly in
cheek. In The Basic Eight, Handler doesn’t
ever shy away from the murder; it seems inevitable that this group of precocious
teenagers, nicknamed The Basic Eight, who are more cultured and intelligent
than their contemporaries will wind up committing many dark and disturbing crimes,
but it is his clever manipulation of language and repetition coupled with striking
descriptions – of first love, of the vertiginously drunken party, of the brutal murder, of the final, shocking
twist – that stop this novel descending into cliché riddled melodrama.
The Basic Eight consists of Flannery, our narrator and
protagonist; Kate, the garrulous Queen Bee; Jennifer Rose Milton, a girl so
beautiful that she can call her mother Maman
and no one minds; Gabriel, who Flan believes is the kindest boy in the
world; Natasha, who is so glamorous and full of panache , she looks less like a
high school student and more like an actress playing a high school student on
TV; Lily, a classical musician; Douglas, Flan’s ex-boyfriend; and V_, whose name
has been erased from the novel to protect her prominent family. Their exclusive
clique holds The Grand Opera Breakfast Club, dinner parties and garden parties,
while finding their way through the expected and unexpected pitfalls of senior
year in high school, including the maelstrom of underage drinking and sex, attempted
rape and corruption, anguish and absinthe. All of this is mirrored with acerbic
precision in the school’s production
of Othello and roles The Basic Eight
are given to play.
What is particularly successful about The Basic Eight is the unusual format; Flannery is editing her
diary from her prison cell and she is annotating and dramatising both events
that happened and others that never existed. The diary form is scattered with asides
from psychiatrists and talk-show hosts, stage directions, vocabulary lists and sardonic,
text-book ‘Study Questions’ for the reader that not only reiterate key points
but also cleverly advance the plot.
Another particular triumph of the book is how Handler
presents Flan and her heartbreak; she initially claims that she is filled with ‘world-weariness
and cynicism’, yet when she realises how boys can act, it is described with
such delicacy that the only conclusion we can draw is that Flan’s naïveté is
crumbling before our eyes – ‘I hadn’t felt such disgust for a boy since the
early days, when they’d tease girls on the playground, kicking us and throwing
gravel and raising their voices in high screechy mockery. “They do that because
they like you,” all the adults said, grinning like pumpkins. We believed them,
back then. Back then we thought it was true, and we were drawn towards all that
meanness because it meant we were special, let them kick us, let them like us.
We liked them back. But now it was turning out that our first instincts were
right. Boys weren’t mean because they liked you; it was because they were mean.’ Flannery’s other
heartbreak – one which cannot be revealed here due to its pivotal function in the
novel – is also similarly arresting, with Handler gently taking us by the hand
and revealing what had been there the whole time.
Handler’s novel creates a world that is so believable, so
tangible and so relatable, that the final twist revels in the perfect irony he
has painstakingly crafted since the first page and we leave, feeling like that
the joke is very much on us.
Rose Knight
No comments:
Post a Comment